Co je podle Wittgensteina řeč?

Studia Neoaristotelica 5 (1):38-50 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author shows that, after some considerations about the nature of speech, we can take two substantially different paths. Wittgenstein’s early philosophy is the paradigm of the first path, his later the paradigm of the second. According the author, the difference between these two conceptions is that in the late Wittgenstein, as opposed to his early conception, rejects the search for, and the clarification of, the essence of our language.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and Phenomenology or.Antonia Soulez - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 33 (1):157-183.
G. Frege a aristotelská ontologie vztahů.Stanislav Sousedík - 2004 - Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1-2):70-78.
G. Frege a aristotelská ontologie vztahů.Stanislav Sousedík - 2004 - Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1-2):70-78.
Člověk a stát. [REVIEW]Stanislav Sousedík - 2008 - Studia Neoaristotelica 5 (1):81-85.
(2) Vyjádření k Maternově poznámce.Stanislav Sousedík - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (1):129-133.
Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy.Michael Beaney - forthcoming - New Content is Available for Journal of the Philosophy of History.
(3) Ke stati Petra Dvořáka.Stanislav Sousedík - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (1):124-125.
Wittgenstein: a way of seeing.Judith Genova - 1995 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
33 (#485,230)

6 months
5 (#641,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references