Consumer Protection: Online Sale of Prescription Drugs to Minors Not Unconscionable

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (2):315-317 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Stovall v. Confimed.com, the Kansas Supreme Court held that an out-of-state medical doctor who sold a prescription drug to a Kansas minor over the Internet did not commit an unconscionable act under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act. The Shawnee Country District Court had enjoined the doctor from prescribing or dispensing prescription medicine within the state of Kansas, and the doctor appealed the injunction to the Kansas Supreme Court. The Supreme Court affirmed the district court's decision to grant injunctive relief, but found no unconscionable conduct under the KCPA.The appellee, Washington physician Dr. Howard J. Levine, sold the sexual enhancement drug Viagra over the Internet through his online pharmacy. Neither the physician nor the online pharmacy was licensed to practice in Kansas. The purchasers were two Kansas residents, one of whom was a minor. Both purchased the drugs in a sting operation conducted by the Kansas Attorney General and received the drugs after completing an online application.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kansas Court Denies Employment Discrimination Claims under ADA, FMLA, and PDA.P. M. B. - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):271-272.
Tenth Circuit Upholds BC/BS's Anti-Assignment Provisions.K. M. - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (1):72-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-06

Downloads
6 (#1,480,141)

6 months
5 (#703,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references