God As the Simplest Explanation of the Universe

Abstract
Inanimate explanation is to be analysed in terms of substances having powers and liabilities to exercise their powers under certain conditions; while personal explanation is to be analysed in terms of persons, their beliefs, powers, and purposes. A crucial criterion for an explanation being probably true is that it is (among explanations leading us to expect the data) the simplest one. Simplicity is a matter of few substances, few kinds of substances, few properties (including powers and liabilities), few kinds of properties, and mathematically simple relations between properties. Explanation of the existence of the universe by the agency of God provides the simplest kind of personal explanation there can be, and one simpler than any inanimate explanation. I defend this view more thoroughly than previously in light of recent challenges.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,612
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Fred I. Dretske (1977). Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science 44 (2):248-268.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Richard Swinburne (1990). The Limits of Explanation. Philosophy 27 (Supplement):177 - 193.
Richard Swinburne (1983). Mackie, Induction, and God. Religious Studies 19 (3):385 - 392.
Richard Swinburne (2006). Relations Between Universals,or Divine Laws? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):179 – 189.
Richard Swinburne (2005). Second Reply to Grünbaum. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925.
Arno Wouters (1995). Viability Explanation. Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):435-457.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-12

Total downloads

78 ( #16,552 of 1,098,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

13 ( #12,616 of 1,098,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.