Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):177-228 (2005)
|Abstract||The criterion of 1 John for preferring John’s community over the secessionists is that the former love one another: John’s heart does not accuse him. Expressions in 1 John and Brown’s commentary suggest that knowledge by affective connaturality and recent neuroscience furnish exegetical access to this text. John’s appeal to the accusing heart is to social praxis as access to doxa. John’s community can know they love and are God’s children only intersubjectively, in the social. John’s heart should accuse him. Were his heart changed, love for the secessionists would not be burdensome. John’s community became a sect because their love never became love for their enemies|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
John Cowburn (1967). Love and the Person: A Philosophical Theory and a Theological Essay. Dublin [Etc.]Chapman.
David Sanderlin (1993). Charity According to St. John of the Cross: A Disinterested Love for Interesting Special Relationships, Including Marriage. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):87 - 115.
Halbert Katzen (2000). The Logic of Love: Finding Faith Through the Heart-Mind Connection. Insights Out Publishing.
Qingping Liu (2001). Is Mencius' Doctrine of 'Commiseration' Tenable? Asian Philosophy 11 (2):73 – 84.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?