David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 188 (1):67-84 (2012)
In this paper I assess the prospects for combining contemporary Everettian quantum mechanics (EQM) with branching-time semantics in the tradition of Kripke, Prior, Thomason and Belnap. I begin by outlining the salient features of ‘decoherence-based’ EQM, and of the ‘consistent histories’ formalism that is particularly apt for conceptual discussions in EQM. This formalism permits of both ‘branching worlds’ and ‘parallel worlds’ interpretations; the metaphysics of EQM is in this sense underdetermined by the physics. A prominent argument due to Lewis (On the Plurality of Worlds, 1986 ) supports the non-branching interpretation. Belnap et al. (Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterministic World, 2001 ) refer to Lewis’ argument as the ‘Assertion problem’, and propose a pragmatic response to it. I argue that their response is unattractively ad hoc and complex, and that it prevents an Everettian who adopts branching-time semantics from making clear sense of objective probability. The upshot is that Everettians are better off without branching-time semantics. I conclude by discussing and rejecting an alternative possible motivation for branching time.
|Keywords||Everett Quantum Branching Semantics Metaphysics Time Many worlds Lewis Belnap Divergence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
N. Belnap & T. Muller (2010). Branching with Uncertain Semantics: Discussion Note on Saunders and Wallace, 'Branching and Uncertainty'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (3):681-696.
Nuel D. Belnap (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford University Press on Demand.
John Bigelow (1988). The Reality of Numbers: A Physicalist's Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Paul M. Churchland (1981). Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78 (February):67-90.
Murray Gell-Mann & James Hartle (1990). Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology. In W. Zurek (ed.), Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alastair Wilson (2012). Objective Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs022.
Peter J. Lewis (2007). Uncertainty and Probability for Branching Selves. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (1):1-14.
Simon Saunders & D. Wallace (2008). Branching and Uncertainty. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):293-305.
Toby Handfield (2012). A Philosophical Guide to Chance: Physical Probability. Cambridge University Press.
Hilary Greaves & Wayne C. Myrvold (2010). Everett and Evidence. In Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent & David Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford University Press.
Alberto Zanardo (2006). Quantification Over Sets of Possible Worlds in Branching-Time Semantics. Studia Logica 82 (3):379 - 400.
Matt Farr (2012). On A- and B-Theoretic Elements of Branching Spacetimes. Synthese 188 (1):85-116.
Jiri Benovsky (2013). Branching and (in)Determinism. Philosophical Papers 42 (2):151-173.
Manolo Martínez (2011). Travelling in Branching Time. Disputatio 4 (31):59-75.
Thomas Müller (2012). Branching in the Landscape of Possibilities. Synthese 188 (1):41-65.
Added to index2011-12-06
Total downloads88 ( #15,304 of 1,099,958 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #24,108 of 1,099,958 )
How can I increase my downloads?