Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (1):143 - 152 (1995)
|Abstract||The paper intends to identify some particular basic assumptions, approaches and means of proceeding, which are spontaneously shared by philosophers, sociologists and historians of science, besides the common interchange of meta-notions describing science. To this end, the specific subject matter, scope, meta-cognitive goals and methodological background of each of the three domains of science study is first outlined. Only two shared proceedings are further discussed in details: the objective attitude, called 'playing a stranger', and the historiographers' involvement in demarcational problem resolution. A far-reaching prospect is finally suggested for philosophers and historiographers: methodological partnership, leading towards the elaboration of an impending integral metatheory of science|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Klaus Hentschel (2003). Der Vergleich AlS Brücke Zwischen Wissenschaftsgeschichte Und Wissenschaftstheorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34 (2):251-275.
Joseph Rouse (1991). Indeterminacy, Empirical Evidence, and Methodological Pluralism. Synthese 86 (3):443 - 465.
Deborah A. Redman (1991). Economics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.
Neven Sesardic (2000). Philosophy of Science That Ignores Science: Race, IQ and Heritability. Philosophy of Science 67 (4):580-602.
Alexander Rosenberg (1990). Normative Naturalism and the Role of Philosophy. Philosophy of Science 57 (1):34-43.
Dominika Yaneva (2006). What Is Science? Methodological Pitfalls Underlying the Empirical Exploration of Scientific Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):333 - 353.
Dominika Yaneva (2006). What is Science? Methodological Pitfalls Underlying the Empirical Exploration of Scientific Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2):333 - 353.
Elizabeth Potter (1994). Methodological Norms in Traditional and Feminist Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:101 - 108.
Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale (2000). Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):109-125.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,844 of 549,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?