Ethical Analysis of “Mind Reading” or “Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension”: Keeping Potential Limitations in Mind

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):32-34 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We appreciate Meynen’s examination of ethical implications of using neurotechnologies to decode neural data and make inferences about cognitive processes. Here, we address three issues that we beli...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Further Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Medicine.Nathan Stout - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):28-29.
Thought Apprehension: The “True” Self and The Risks of Mind Reading.Andrea Lavazza - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):19-21.
Concepts of consciousness.Thomas Natsoulas - 1983 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 4 (1):195-232.
Real Apprehension in Newman’s An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent.R. Michael Olson - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):499-516.
Mandatory neurotechnological treatment: ethical issues.Farah Focquaert - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (1):59-72.
The Philosophy of Mind Wandering.Irving Zachary & Thompson Evan - forthcoming - In Fox Kieran & Christoff Kalina (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Spontaneous Thought and Creativity. Oxford University Press.
Default semantics and the architecture of the mind.Alessandro Capone - 2011 - Journal of Pragmatics 43:1741–1754..

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-10

Downloads
26 (#600,921)

6 months
8 (#347,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?