Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Guinea Pig Duties: 6. Non-Consensual Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):51-58.
    In the first five of these articles I have questioned the justice, and effectiveness, of total dependence in clinical research on willing volunteers. I have explored ways that might better and more equitably spread the burden of participating in clinical research as subjects of it. Here I consider this question: if consent is the barrier, must we regard consent as indispensable?
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The battering of informed consent.M. Kottow - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):565-569.
    Autonomy has been hailed as the foremost principle of bioethics, and yet patients’ decisions and research subjects’ voluntary participation are being subjected to frequent restrictions. It has been argued that patient care is best served by a limited form of paternalism because the doctor is better qualified to take critical decisions than the patient, who is distracted by illness. The revival of paternalism is unwarranted on two grounds: firstly, because prejudging that the sick are not fully autonomous is a biased (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Informed consent for telemedicine in South Africa: A survey of consent practices among healthcare professionals in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal.C. L. Jack & M. Mars - 2013 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 6 (2):55.
  • Genetic information, rights, and autonomy.Matti Häyry & Tuija Takala - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5):403-414.
    Rights, autonomy, privacy, and confidentialityare concepts commonly used in discussionsconcerning genetic information. When theseconcepts are thought of as denoting absolutenorms and values which cannot be overriden byother considerations, conflicts among themnaturally occur.In this paper, these and related notions areexamined in terms of the duties and obligationsmedical professionals and their clients canhave regarding genetic knowledge. It issuggested that while the prevailing idea ofautonomy is unhelpful in the analysis of theseduties, and the ensuing rights, an alternativereading of personal self-determination canprovide a firmer (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Reconsidering counselling and consent.David R. Hall & Anton A. Niekerk - 2015 - Developing World Bioethics 17 (1):4-10.
    In the current era patient autonomy is enormously important. However, recently there has also been some movement back to ensure that trust in the doctor's skill, knowledge and virtue is not excluded in the process. These new nuances of informed consent have been referred to by terms such as beneficent paternalism, experience-based paternalism and we would add virtuous paternalism. The purpose of this paper is to consider the history and current problematic nature of counselling and consent. Starting with the tradition (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Privacy Behaviour: A Model for Online Informed Consent.Gary Burkhardt, Frederic Boy, Daniele Doneddu & Nick Hajli - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 186 (1):237-255.
    An online world exists in which businesses have become burdened with managerial and legal duties regarding the seeking of informed consent and the protection of privacy and personal data, while growing public cynicism regarding personal data collection threatens the healthy development of marketing and e-commerce. This research seeks to address such cynicism by assisting organisations to devise ethical consent management processes that consider an individual’s attitudes, their subjective norms and their perceived sense of control during the elicitation of consent. It (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The impossibility of informed consent?Kenneth Boyd - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):44-47.