Biological Theory 5 (4):296-311 (2010)

Lonnie Aarssen
Queen's University
Darwinism presents a paradox. It discredits the notion that one’s life has any intrinsic meaning, yet it predicts that we are designed by Darwinian natural selection to generally insist that it must—and so necessarily designed to misunderstand and doubt Darwinism. The implications of this paradox are explored here, including the question of where then does the Darwinist find meaning in life? The main source, it is proposed, is from cognitive domains for meaning inherited from sentient ancestors—domains that reveal our evolved human nature as the fool that it is: given to distractions and delusions of many kinds, designed by natural selection primarily for one essential purpose—to allay our instinctual fear of failed legacy, rooted in our uniquely human awareness that we are not immortal. Darwinism, however, also teaches that genuine legacy is a fate enjoyed only by individual genes. Accordingly, as argued here, those genes with the grandest legacy—and hence rampant within us—are of two types: “legacy-drive” genes delude us into thinking that the legacy can be individually and personally ours; and “leisure-drive” genes distract us from the agonizing truth that it can never be. The most rudimental delusion of legacy is the perception of offspring as vehicles for memetic legacy—the transmission of resident memes from one’s mind to the minds and behaviors of offspring— thus also ensuring genetic legacy: the transmission of resident genes, including importantly, genes inherited from ancestors that influence both legacy and leisure drives. Today, legacyand leisure-drive genes reveal their phenotypes across a wide range of human affairs, and together with the phenotypes of survival- and sex-drive genes, they provide a foundation for a novel view of the Darwinian roots of cultural evolution.
Keywords culture  delusions  distractions  human nature  immortality  legacy  leisure  memes  religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/BIOT_a_00060
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.David L. Hull - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):435-438.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.Daniel C. Dennett - 1995 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 17 (2):235-240.

View all 49 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Will Empathy Save Us?Lonnie W. Aarssen - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (3):211-217.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to Holland... The Meaning of Life and Darwinism.John Cottingham - 2011 - Environmental Values 20 (3):299 - 308.
Purpose, Meaning and Darwinism.Mary Midgley - 2009 - Philosophy Now 71:16-19.
Rose's Homeodynamic Perspective is Not an Alternative to Neo-Darwinism.A. J. Wells - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):911-912.
The Religious Issue: What is Darwinism?Charles Hodge - 1967 - In Raymond Jackson Wilson (ed.), Darwinism and the American Intellectual. Homewood, Ill., Dorsey Press.
The Influence of Darwinism on Philosopy.John Dewey - 1967 - In Raymond Jackson Wilson (ed.), Darwinism and the American Intellectual. Homewood, Ill., Dorsey Press.
Darwinism and Social Ethics: The Elements of Moral Science.Noah Porter - 1967 - In Raymond Jackson Wilson (ed.), Darwinism and the American Intellectual. Homewood, Ill., Dorsey Press.
Darwinism, Purpose and Meaning.Mary Midgley - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68:193-201.


Added to PP index

Total views
285 ( #24,972 of 2,325,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #29,749 of 2,325,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes