Disclosing Reproductive Genetic Carrier Status: What about the Donor?

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):126-128 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their recent article, Dive, Holmes, and Newson (2023) argue that genetic information should be reported in accordance with the aims of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). Referring to...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2023.2207544

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How should severity be understood in the context of reproductive genetic carrier screening?Lisa Dive, Alison D. Archibald, Lucinda Freeman & Ainsley J. Newson - 2023 - Bioethics 37 (4):359-366.
Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: From the Clinic to the Population.Lisa Dive & Ainsley J. Newson - 2021 - Public Health Ethics 14 (2):202-217.
Is it acceptable to contact an anonymous egg donor to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor-conceived child?Rachel Horton, Benjamin Bell, Angela Fenwick & Anneke M. Lucassen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (6):357-360.
Contacting gamete donors to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor-conceived child: what are the rights and obligations of gamete donors in these cases? A response to Horton et al.Lucy Frith - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (3):220-222.
Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique.Lisa Dive & Ainsley J. Newson - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (12):1060-1067.
From Community-Based Carrier Programs to Opportunistic Carrier Screening: How the Objective of Carrier Screening Was Lost in Translation.Anne-Marie Laberge - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):123-126.
Heterozygote Carrier Testing in High Schools Abroad: What are the Lessons for the U.S.?Lainie Friedman Ross - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):753-764.
Reproductive autonomy or responsible parenthood? Conflicting ethical framings of genetic carrier screening.Peter Wehling, Beatrice Perera & Sabrina Schüssler - 2020 - Ethik in der Medizin 32 (4):313-329.
The aims of expanded universal carrier screening: Autonomy, prevention, and responsible parenthood.Sanne van der Hout, Wybo Dondorp & Guido de Wert - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (5):568-576.
New Reproductive Technologies are Morally Problematic.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2000 - In James Torr (ed.), Medical Ethics. Greenhaven Press.
Eugenics Redux: “Reproductive Benefit” as a Rationale for Newborn Screening.Diane B. Paul - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S2):12-13.
Is It Just for a Screening Program to Give People All the Information They Want?Lisa Dive, Isabella Holmes & Ainsley J. Newson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):34-42.
Creating a stem cell donor: A case study in reproductive genetics.Jeffrey P. Kahn & Anna C. Mastroianni - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):81-96.
Why is an Egg Donor a Genetic Parent, but not a Mitochondrial Donor?Monika Piotrowska - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):488-498.
The New Kinship: Constructing Donor-Conceived Families.Naomi R. Cahn - 2012 - New York University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-22

Downloads
17 (#862,403)

6 months
12 (#208,422)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references