Ratio Juris 9 (4):331-348 (1996)
The main purpose of this paper is to explore the role played by logic in the legal domain. In the traditional conception which underlies the movement of codification, judges are able to find in the legal system (the Master System) a unique answer for every legal problem. This entails its completeness, consistency and the possibility of deriving from it the contents of all judicial decisions. Although the ideal model of this conception is supported by important theoretical and political ideals, it has significant shortcomings. The elements of normative systems (Master Systems) are “norms” and not mere “norm-formulations.” A “norm” is the meaning attributed to normative linguistic expressions. The set of all normative expressions, such as statutes, codes, etc. forms what is called the Master Book. One of the main problems for the ideal model is the identification of a normative system behind the Master Book. Interpretative arguments are the tools designed to solve these problems. Although the requirements of the model are not totally fulfilled in actual practice, it remains as an effective ideal rational goal behind legal activities linked to adjudication and most theoretical approaches to law.
|Keywords||Legal reasoning Legal interpretation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
An Improved Factor Based Approach to Precedential Constraint.Adam Rigoni - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (2):133-160.
Similar books and articles
On Relationships Between the Logic of Law, Legal Positivism and Semiotics of Law.Vadim Verenich - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2-4):145-195.
Situational Logic and Covering Law Explanations in History.Michael Martin - 1968 - Inquiry 11 (1-4):388 – 399.
Lógicas normativas y la reconstrucción deI razonamiento jurídico.Roberto J. Vernengo - 1992 - Theoria 7 (1/2/3):1115-1124.
The Province and Function of Law, Law as Logic, Justice and Social Control.Julius Stone - 1947 - London: Stevens.
The Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice, and Social Control, a Study in Jurisprudence.Julius Stone - 1946 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
In Defense of the Law of Noncontradiction.Edward N. Zalta - 2004 - In J. C. Beall, B. Armour-Garb & G. Priest (eds.), The Law of Noncontradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Readings in Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy.Morris Raphael Cohen - 1951 - New York: Prentice-Hall.
Mathematical Jurisprudence and Mathematical Ethics: A Mathematical Simulation of the Evaluative and the Normative Attitudes to the Rigoristic Sub-Systems of the Positive Law and of the Natural-Law-and-Morals.V. O. Lobovikov - 1999 - The Urals State University Press.
Conflicts of Norms and the Revision of Normative Systems.Carlos E. Alchourrón - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (4):413 - 425.
Deontic Logic in the Representation of Law: Towards a Methodology. [REVIEW]Andrew J. I. Jones & Marek Sergot - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):45-64.
Jumps and Logic in the Law.Aleksander Peczenik - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):297-329.
Meta-Halakhah: Logic, Intuition and the Unfolding of Jewish Law.Moshe Koppel - 1996 - Jason Aronson.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads79 ( #62,928 of 2,143,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #163,222 of 2,143,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.