Why Cultural Sociology Is Not ‘Idealist’

Theory, Culture and Society 22 (6):19-29 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I make use of this reply to McLennan to offer an overall perspective on the development of my work, normatively, empirically and theoretically, and in its earlier neofunctionalist and later cultural-sociological phase. I argue that, despite periodic suggestions that my cultural sociology seeks to push sociology towards an absolute subjectivity, the social-epistemological framework of ‘multidimensionality’ around which I organized my first work, Theoretical Logic in Sociology, still holds. Cultural sociology introduces a method and theory for understanding a dimension of social life, it is not an attempt to explain every part of social life. There is still structural power according to this perspective, but the nature and force of this power must be understood differently. It is a mistake for social science to take a ‘realist’ path, either in its epistemology or in its mode of explanation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
23 (#670,463)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Signs, webs, and memories.Andrea Cossu - 2017 - Thesis Eleven 140 (1):74-89.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Codes and conflict.Philip Smith - 1991 - Theory and Society 20 (1):103-138.

Add more references