- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory
Princeton University Press (2006)
Abstract
This is a revision of game theory which takes account of agents' own descriptions of their situations, and which allows people to reason as members of groups.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory. [REVIEW]Raimo Tuomela - 2009 - Economics and Philosophy 25 (1):125-133.
Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory.Natalie Gold & Robert Sugden (eds.) - 2006 - Princeton University Press.
Beyond individual choice: Teams and frames in game theory , Michael bacharach; edited and with an introduction and a conclusion by Natalie gold and Robert Sugden. Princeton university press, princeton, 2006, XXIII + 214 pp. [REVIEW]Raimo Tuomela - 2009 - Economics and Philosophy 25 (1):125-133.
A choice for 'me' or for 'us'? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games.David J. Butler - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (1):53-76.
Logic and the epistemic foundations of game theory: special issue.Michael O. L. Bacharach & Philippe Mongin - 1994 - Theory and Decision 37 (1):1-6.
We-thinking and vacillation between frames: filling a gap in Bacharach’s theory.Alessandra Smerilli - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (4):539-560.
Team agency and conditional games.Andre Hofmeyr & Don Ross - 2019 - In Michiru Nagatsu & Attilia Ruzzene (eds.), Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy.S. M. Amadae (ed.) - 2015 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rationality and the backwards induction argument.José Luis Bermúdez - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):243–248.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-09
Downloads
56 (#278,227)
6 months
7 (#592,566)
2014-03-09
Downloads
56 (#278,227)
6 months
7 (#592,566)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Toward a second-person neuroscience.Bert Timmermans, Vasudevi Reddy, Alan Costall, Gary Bente, Tobias Schlicht, Kai Vogeley & Leonhard Schilbach - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):393-414.
Disagreement about Taste: Commonality Presuppositions and Coordination.Teresa Marques & Manuel García-Carpintero - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):701-723.
Collective Intentions And Team Agency.Natalie Gold & Robert Sugden - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (3):109-137.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-5pqs9 uwo