Bare Particulars and Acquaintance: A Reply to Mr. Trentman

Dialogue 5 (4):580-583 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider two red disks having the same non-relational properties. That they are two and not one, it is claimed by some philosophers, can only be accounted for by claiming that each disk contains an individuator, i.e., a bare particular, which is merely numerically different from the particular in the other disk. While sucli a claim is clearly dialectical, one need not rest the case for bare particulars solely on the dialectical argument. One can, by giving an accurate phenomenological description of the situation containing the two red disks, also attempt to show that one is in fact acquainted with such entities. This latter possibility, however, has recently been challenged by Trentman on the grounds that one cannot give such a description without presupposing the existence of bare particulars.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
14 (#994,650)

6 months
11 (#339,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Bare particulars.Edwin B. Allaire - 1963 - Philosophical Studies 14 (1-2):1 - 8.
Logic and Reality.Gustav Bergmann - 1964 - Foundations of Language 3 (4):429-432.
The Tractatus: Nominalistic or Realistic?Edwin B. Allaire - 1963 - In Edwin Bonar Allaire (ed.), Essays in ontology. Iowa City,: University of Iowa.

Add more references