The Notion of Desert and the Law of Contrapasso

In Dante's Deadly Sins. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 73–103 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: The Notion of Desert The Contrapasso The Problem of Proportionality First Case Study: Francesca Second Case Study: Brutus and Cassius Third Case Study: Epicurus Dante's Moral Conception.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

9781118112434

DOI

10.1002/9781118112434.ch3

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can Comparative Desert do Without Equality?Kerah Gordon-Solmon - 2015 - Philosophical Papers 44 (2):189-205.
Keeping Balance: On Desert and Propriety.Diana Abad - 2007 - Frankfurt: Ontos.
Satan’s Unconquerable Will and Milton’s Use of Dantean Contrapasso in Paradise Lost.Ethan Smilie - 2013 - Renascence 65 (2):91-102.
Paradoxes and Puzzles Virgil and Cato.Raymond Angelo Belliotti - 2011 - In Dante's Deadly Sins. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 104–123.
Moral Desert: A Critique.Howard Simmons - 2010 - Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rawls’s Rejection of Preinstitutional Desert.Tea Logar - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (4):483-494.
The fitting, the deserving, and the beautiful.Leo Zaibert - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):331-350.
The Geometry of Desert.Shelly Kagan - 2005 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
What Makes the Free Will Debate Substantive?Derk Pereboom - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (3):257-264.
Desert is a dyadic relation.Toby Napoletano - 2022 - Analysis 82 (4):600-607.
Desert-based Justice.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 152-173.
The Trilemma of Desert.Stephen Kershnar - 2006 - Public Affairs Quarterly 20 (3):219-233.
Just Deserts and Needs.Gillian Brock - 1999 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):165-188.
You’ve Earned It!: A Criticism of Sher’s Account of Desert in Wages.Ryan Jenkins - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:75-86.
The Three-Case Argument against the Moral Justificatory Significance of Basic Desert.Aleksandr Mishura - 2021 - Philosophia 50 (3):1327-1340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
5 (#1,557,546)

6 months
2 (#1,250,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references