The war convention and the moral division of labour

Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):593-617 (2009)

Abstract

My claim is that despite powerful arguments to the contrary, a coherent moral distinction between the jus in bello code and the jus ad bellum code can be sustained. In particular, I defend the traditional just war doctrine according to which the independence between the in bello and ad bellum codes reflects the moral equality between just and unjust combatants and between just and unjust non-combatants. In order to establish this, I construe an in bello proportionality condition which can be satisfied by just and unjust combatants alike.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
92 (#129,885)

6 months
1 (#388,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.G. A. Cohen - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3-30.
The Ethics of Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Proportionality in the Morality of War.Thomas Hurka - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1):34-66.
The Ethics of Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.

View all 9 references / Add more references