Naturalism and Its Inadvertent Defenders

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3-4):489-501 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The interpretive turn in the social sciences, although much discussed, has effectively stalled and even begun to backslide. With the publication of Interpretive Social Science: An Anti-Naturalist Approach, we provide a systematic defense of interpretive inquiry intended to help reinvigorate this mode of study across the human sciences. This defense, unfortunately, needs to be deployed not only against social scientists who unwittingly adopt naturalistic philosophical assumptions, but against interpretivist fellow travelers such as Michel Foucault, who occasionally do the same thing; and even against interpretivists who assume that their philosophical position is secured by using only qualitative methods, and that quantitative methods are inherently unsuitable to interpretivist purposes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-02

Downloads
6 (#1,482,791)

6 months
1 (#1,723,047)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scholarly Reflexivity, Methodological Practice, and Bevir and Blakely's Anti-Naturalism.Peregrine Schwartz-Shea - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3):462-480.
Anti-Naturalism and Structure in Interpretive Social Science.Lisa Wedeen - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3):481-488.
Beyond Social Science Naturalism: The Case for Ecumenical Interpretivism.Cornel Ban - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3-4):454-461.

Add more references