… And Then Again, He Might Not Be

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):517-521 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In reply to Michael Bertrand, I clarify my view that the problem of physical evil is not an a priori problem but an a posteriori one

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God might be responsible for physical evil.Michael Bertrand - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):513 – 515.
Reply to Fumerton.Keith Lehrer - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):436-438.
Tooley and evil: A reply.Alvin Plantinga - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (1):66 – 75.
The Significance of Intuitions of Contingency for the Mind Body Problem.Judith M. Feldmann - 1997 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Reply To Oliver Wiertz, Masahiro Morioka And Francesca Greco.Yujin Nagasawa - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (3):255-262.
Analysis in Mind.Andrew Botterell - 1998 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-20

Downloads
83 (#207,822)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander James Bird
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Problem of Evil.Michael Tooley - 2008 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The problem of evil.Michael Tooley - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Unexpected a posteriori necessary laws of nature.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):533 – 548.
God might be responsible for physical evil.Michael Bertrand - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):513 – 515.

Add more references