Comparison of patients' and health care professionals' attitudes towards advance directives

Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):328-335 (1998)

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to identify and compare the attitudes of patients and health care professionals towards advance directives. Advance directives promote recognition of the patient's autonomy, letting the individual exercise a certain measure of control over life-sustaining care and treatment in the eventuality of becoming incompetent. DESIGN: Attitudes to advance directives were evaluated using a 44-item self-reported questionnaire. It yields an overall score as well as five factor scores: autonomy, beneficence, justice, external norms, and the affective dimension. SETTING: Health care institutions in the province of Québec, Canada. Survey sample: The sampling consisted of 921 subjects: 123 patients, 167 physicians, 340 nurses and 291 administrators of health care institutions. RESULTS: Although the general attitude of each population was favourable to the expression of autonomy, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated that physicians attached less importance to this subscale than did other populations (p < .001). Above all, they favoured legal external norms and beneficence. Physicians and administrators also attached less importance to the affective dimension than did patients and nurses. Specifically, physicians' attitudes towards advance directives were shown to be less positive than patients' attitudes. CONCLUSION: More attention should be given to the importance of adequately informing patients about advance directives because they may not represent an adequate means for patients to assert their autonomy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.24.5.328
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

After the Patient Self‐Determination Act.Joanne Lynn & Joan M. Teno - 1993 - Hastings Center Report 23 (1):20-24.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Value History: A Necessary Family Document.Renate G. Justin - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Is Care a Virtue for Health Care Professionals?Howard J. Curzer - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):51-69.
Towards a Just, Courageous, and Honest Resolution of the Futility Debate.Rosemarie Tong - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.
Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Simplified Models of the Relationship Between Health and Disease.Bjørn Hofmann - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (5):355-377.


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #264,471 of 2,328,130 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #725,336 of 2,328,130 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature