Nature Human Behaviour 3 (2):136-142 (2019)
AbstractThe use of forward models is well established in cognitive and computational neuroscience. We compare and contrast two recent, but interestingly divergent, accounts of the place of forward models in the human cognitive architecture. On the Auxiliary Forward Model account, forward models are special-purpose prediction mechanisms implemented by additional circuitry distinct from core mechanisms of perception and action. On the Integral Forward Model account, forward models lie at the heart of all forms of perception and action. We compare these neighbouring but importantly different visions and consider their implications for the cognitive sciences. We end by asking what kinds of empirical research might offer evidence favouring one or the other of these approaches.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
The Effect of Mode of Presentation on Tower of Hanoi Problem Solving.Madison Fansher, Priti Shah & Sébastien Hélie - 2022 - Cognition 224:105041.
Similar books and articles
Getting Ahead: Forward Models and Their Place in Cognitive Architecture.Martin J. Pickering & Andy Clark - 2014 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 (9):451-456.
Predictions, Precision, and Agentive Attention.Andy Clark - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 56:115-119.
Dynamic Mechanistic Explanation: Computational Modeling of Circadian Rhythms as an Exemplar for Cognitive Science.William Bechtel & Adele Abrahamsen - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):321-333.
Inner Speech as a Forward Model?Gary M. Oppenheim - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):369-370.
The Concept of Simulation in Control-Theoretic Accounts of Motor Control and Action Perception.Mitchell Herschbach - 2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 315--20.
Mechanisms in Psychology: Ripping Nature at its Seams.Catherine Stinson - 2016 - Synthese 193 (5).
Cognitive Models and Representation.Rebecca Kukla - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):219-32.
Is There Any Evidence for Forward Modeling in Language Production?Myrto I. Mylopoulos & David Pereplyotchik - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):368-369.
Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces.Jeenath Rahaman, Harshit Agrawal, Nisheeth Srivastava & Sanjay Chandrasekharan - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (2):370-415.
Dynamical Models: An Alternative or Complement to Mechanistic Explanations?David M. Kaplan & William Bechtel - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):438-444.
Forward Models and Their Implications for Production, Comprehension, and Dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):377-392.
Are Forward Models Enough to Explain Self-Monitoring? Insights From Patients and Eye Movements.Robert J. Hartsuiker - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):357-358.