Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):357-358 (2013)

Abstract
At the core of Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) theory is a monitor that uses forward models. I argue that this account is challenged by neuropsychological findings and visual world eye-tracking data and that it has two conceptual problems. I propose that conflict monitoring avoids these issues and should be considered a promising alternative to perceptual loop and forward modeling theories
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x12002749
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defense, Dreams and Rationality.Harvey Mullane - 1983 - Synthese 57 (2):187 - 204.
Where in the Brain Does the Forward Model Lurk?Opher Donchin & Amir Raz - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):402-403.
How Scientific Models Can Explain.Alisa Bokulich - 2011 - Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45.
Imagery and Memory Illusions.Frédérique Robin - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (2):253-262.
Intentions, Self‐Monitoring and Abnormal Experiences.R. C. Morris - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):77 – 83.
Deluding the Motor System.Sarah-Jayne Blakemore - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):647-655.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
13 ( #690,967 of 2,348,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,851 of 2,348,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes