European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1768-1790 (2017)

Authors
Matt Bower
Texas State University
Abstract
There is a longstanding debate among Husserl scholars about whether Husserl thinks perception involves mental representation. The debate, I believe, has not been settled. I deny that the existentialist-inspired charge of representationalism about perception in Husserl is precise enough to stick. Given a clearer understanding of just what mental representation amounts to, I contend that those who defend Husserl against the accusation of representationalism fare little better than Husserl's existentialist-leaning critics. I argue that he is in fact a representationalist about perception insofar as it involves a noematic sense. Nevertheless, Husserl opens up the possibility for a representation-free form of perceiving in certain later discussions of the matter in which he suggests that some perceptual states lack noematic sense. What they lack in noematic sense is compensated for by other means, namely, by two sorts of affect and their functional interrelation with abilities for bodily movement. The texts that entertain this possibility, though, severely limit the scope of its actual occurrence. Husserl never commits to a generally or substantially nonrepresentational view of perception. I attempt to sketch out, however, what this nonrepresentationalism about perception that Husserl nearly landed on might look like, rearranging various more or less familiar elements already present in his theory of perception to that end.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/ejop.12261
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,109
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.Marc H. Bornstein - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):203-206.
Phenomenology of Perception.Aron Gurwitsch, M. Merleau-Ponty & Colin Smith - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (3):417.
Perceptual Content Defended.Susanna Schellenberg - 2011 - Noûs 45 (4):714 - 750.
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.Richard E. Aquila - 1985 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1):159-170.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Husserl on Sensation, Perception, and Interpretation.Walter Hopp - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):219-245.
Brentano and Husserl on Intentional Objects and Perception.Dagfinn Føllesdal - 1978 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 5 (1):83-94.
Brentano and Husserl on Intentional Objects and Perception.Dagfinn Føllesdal - 1978 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 5 (1):83-94.
Perception.Kevin Mulligan - 1995 - In David Woodruff Smith & Barry Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press.
Merleau-Ponty on Husserl: A Reappraisal.Dan Zahavi - 2002 - In Ted Toadvine & Lester E. Embree (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-28

Total views
19 ( #537,649 of 2,411,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,414 of 2,411,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes