Response to open Peer commentaries on “three ways to politicize bioethics”

American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W6 – W7 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many commentators today lament the politicization of bioethics, but some suggest distinguishing among different kinds of politicization. This essay pursues that idea with reference to three traditions of political thought: liberalism, communitarianism, and republicanism. After briefly discussing the concept of politicization itself, the essay examines how each of these political traditions manifests itself in recent bioethics scholarship, focusing on the implications of each tradition for the design of government bioethics councils. The liberal emphasis on the irreducible plurality of values and interests in modern societies, and the communitarian concern with the social dimensions of biotechnology, offer important insights for bioethics councils. The essay finds the most promise in the republican tradition, however, which emphasizes institutional mechanisms that allow bioethics councils to enrich but not dominate public deliberation, while ensuring that government decisions on bioethical issues are publicly accountable and contestable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to open Peer commentaries on “why treat the wounded?”.Michael L. Gross - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):W1 – W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Visual Bioethics”.Paul Lauritzen - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):2-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
16 (#830,801)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark B. Brown
California State University, Sacramento

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations