The Conflict Between Religion and Science in Light of the Patterns of Religious Belief Among Scientists
Zygon 38 (3):603-632 (2003)
AbstractRecent summaries of psychologist James H. Leuba's pioneering studies on the religious beliefs of American scientists have misrepresented his findings and ignored important aspects of his analyses, including predictions regarding the future of religion. Much of the recent interest in Leuba was sparked by Edward J. Larson and Larry Witham's commentary in Nature , “Scientists Are Still Keeping the Faith.” Larson and Witham compared the results of their 1996 survey of one thousand randomly selected American scientists regarding their religious beliefs with a similar survey published eighty years earlier by Leuba. Leuba's original studies are themselves problematical. Nonetheless, his notion that different fields of science have different impacts on the religion‐science relationship remains valid. Especially significant is his appreciation of religion as a dynamic, compelling force in human life: any waning of traditional beliefs does not mean a decrease in religious commitment but calls for a new spirituality in harmony with modern scientific teachings. Leuba's studies, placed in proper context, offer a broad historical perspective from which to interpret data about religious beliefs of scientists and the impact of science and scientists on public beliefs, and opportunity to develop new insight into the religion‐science relationship
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Philosophy and Biblical Interpretation: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Conflict.Peter Addinall - 1991 - Cambridge University Press.
Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to Be Irrational? The Epistemic Consequences of the Cognitive Science of Religion.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):77-98.
The Cognitive Science of Religion/Atheism and its Impact on Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology.Richard Jonathan Sagar - unknown
True Fiction: Philosophy and Psychology of Religious Belief.Ilkka Pyysia¨Inen - 2003 - Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):109-125.
Reason and Religious Belief: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion.Michael Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach & David Basinger - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Religion Versus Science: The Conflict in Reference to Truth Value, Not Cash Value.Ervin Laszlo - 2005 - Zygon 40 (1):57-61.
Social Anthropology and the Philosophy of Religion.Ninian Smart - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):287-299.
Are Evolutionary/Cognitive Theories of Religion Relevant for Philosophy of Religion?Gregory R. Peterson - 2010 - Zygon 45 (3):545-557.
Readings in Philosophy of Religion: Ancient to Contemporary.Linda Zagzebski & Timothy D. Miller (eds.) - 2009 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Religious Belief and the Problems of Cognitivity and Commitment: A Reappraisal Based on Contemporary Philosophy of Science.Richard Alan Knopp - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
References found in this work
American Men of Science: A Biographical Directory.J. McKeen Cattell & Jaques Cattell (eds.) - 1927 - Forgotten Books.
Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion.Edward J. Larson - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (1):220-222.
Citations of this work
No citations found.