Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (2):135-150 (2002)
In this paper we analyse some misleading theses concerning the oldcontroversy over the relation between mind and body presented incontemporary medical literature. We undertake an epistemologicalclarification of the axiomatic structure of medical methods. Thisclarification, in turn, requires a precise philosophical explanation ofthe presupposed concepts. This analysis will establish two results: (1)that the mind-body dualism cannot be understood as a kind of biologicalvariation of the subject-object dichotomy in physics, and (2) that thethesis of the incompatibility between somatic and psychosomatic medicineheld by naturalists and others lacks solid epistemologicalfoundation.
|Keywords||mind-body dualism axiomatic psychosomatic medical methodology ontology epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Near-Death Experiences and the Mind-Body Relationship: A Systems-Theoretical Perspective.David Rousseau - 2011 - Journal of Near-Death Studies 29 (3):399-435.
Computers and the Mind-Body Problem: On Ontological and Epistemological Dualism.Adam Drozdek - 1993 - Idealistic Studies 23 (1):39-48.
Mind-Body Continuism: Dualities Without Dualism.Edward W. James - 1991 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 233 (4):233-255.
Residual Asymmetric Dualism: A Theory of Mind-Body Relations.Arthur Efron - 1992 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 13 (2):113-36.
Should a Christian Be a Mind-Body Dualist? - No.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2004 - In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Malden MA: Blackwell.
'Need a Christian Be a Mind/Body Dualist' ?Lynne Rudder Baker - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (4):489-504.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads73 ( #70,923 of 2,158,435 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,773 of 2,158,435 )
How can I increase my downloads?