Философская теология до и после Плантинги (Philosophical Theology before and after Plantinga)

Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science 46:183–192 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alvin Plantinga has played a pivotal role in bringing theological questions and ideas into the broad philosophical, predominantly non-theistic community. His “Advice to Christian Philosophers” (1983) was the turning point in the history of philosophical theology. In his “Advice” Plantinga talks about how best to be a Christian in philosophy. He suggests that Christian intellectuals should become more autonomous from the rest of philosophical world, display more unity, and express greater Christian self-confidence. These advices, however, are addressed not to just any intellectual of a Christian affiliation. He addresses them to those 1) who have graduated from a conservative Christian college, 2) who have obtained a PhD in philosophy, and 3) who continue their career as professional philosophers. That means that the person should be well acquainted with the traditional Christian doctrine and practice, should be well versed in the contemporary analytic philosophy, and should be an acknowledged member of the established philosophical community. It would be a mistake to apply Plantinga’s “Advice” to a person who does not meet all of the three requirements. The present day situation in Russia is such that there is a dramatic shortfall of those intellectuals who satisfy all of the three Plantinga’s requirements. It is still premature for Russian Christian philosophers to become autonomous from the rest of the philosophical community, to establish Christian philosophical clusters, and to display Christian self-confidence in the face of the non-theistic majority. Philosophical theology in Russia is currently in its “pre-Plantingan” phase. In order to improve this situation I suggest reversing Plantinga’s advices into their opposites. Russian Christian philosophers ought to learn how to operate within the broad philosophical community. They should familiarize themselves with the contemporary analytic philosophy and its methods, and they should become acknowledged members of the established professional circles. Then, and only then, philosophical theology in Russia can enter its post-Plantingan era.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Natural theology.Graham Oppy - 2007 - In Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga: Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 15-47.
Some Remarks on Plantinga’s Advice.Peter an Inwagon - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):164-172.
Some Remarks on Plantinga’s Advice.Peter Van Inwagen - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):164-172.
Orthodoxy and Heresy.Eleonore Stump - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):147-163.
The Analytic Theist: An Alvin Plantinga Reader.Alvin Plantinga - 1998 - Eerdmans. Edited by J. F. Sennet.
Why so negative about negative theology? The search for a plantinga-proof apophaticism.Samuel R. Lebens - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (3):259-275.
Some Remarks on Plantinga’s Advice.Merold Westphal - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):164-172.
Special Issue: The Son of God.Matthew Owen & Fred Sanders (eds.) - 2019 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology.
Cardinal Newman, Reformed Epistemologist?Stephen R. Grimm - 2001 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (4):497-522.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-15

Downloads
417 (#44,978)

6 months
67 (#63,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pavel Butakov
Institute Of Philosophy And Law, Novosibirsk

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations