Dilemata 9:153-174 (2012)

Authors
Mar Cabezas
University of Salzburg
Abstract
States, as agents who make moral and political decisions, may also be influenced in decision making by emotions as fear, cognitive states as worry, expectations, etc. that will crystallize in the way they cope with the new challenging agenda. Bearing in mind that the argumentative debates about new risky technologies focus on the precautionary principle, and on an anticipated fear, this manuscript suggests to analyze the main biases that arise in the state anxiety (in attention, selection and evaluation of information, and memory) and vice versa, the different types of coping with anxiety depending of the styles of processing the information ( i.e. highly sensitive, highly anxious, repressive, and non-defensive); and will relate them to the different ways of interpreting the precautionary principle. Eventually, I will emphasize the advantages of a better knowledge of our emotional nature and an emotional education, also in political decision making
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,797
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Handbook of Risk Theory.Sabine Roeser (ed.) - forthcoming - Springer.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

El filósofo, la filosofía y la política.Ángel Bustillos Peña - 2012 - Revista de Filosofía (Venezuela) 70 (1):9-17.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-23

Total views
7 ( #1,015,720 of 58,757 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,462 of 58,757 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes