Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):526-530 (2014)

Abstract
The author analyses how debate over the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has tended to privilege certain conceptions of psychiatric diagnosis over others, as well as to polarise positions regarding psychiatric diagnosis. The article aims to muddy the black and white tenor of many discussions regarding psychiatric diagnosis by moving away from the preoccupation with diagnosis as classification and refocusing attention on diagnosis as a temporally and spatially complex, as well as highly mediated process. The article draws on historical, sociological and first-person perspectives regarding psychiatric diagnosis in order to emphasise the conceptual—and potentially ethical—benefits of ambivalence vis-à-vis the achievements and problems of psychiatric diagnosis
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2013-101763
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemic Injustice — Power and the Ethics of Knowing.Kristian Høyer Toft - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):117-119.
When Psychiatric Diagnosis Becomes an Overworked Tool.George Szmukler - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):517-520.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Psychiatric Taxonomy: At the Crossroads of Science and Ethics.Şerife Tekin - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):513-514.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-16

Total views
18 ( #610,929 of 2,518,466 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,466 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes