Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143 (1992)
Central to Holmes Rolston’s Environmental Ethics is the theoretical quest of most enviromnental philosophers for a defensible concept of intrinsic value for nonhuman natural entities and nature as a whole. Rolston’s theory is similar to Paul Taylor’s in rooting intrinsic value in conation, but dissimilar in assigning value bonuses to consciousness and self-consciousness and value dividends to organic wholes andelemental nature. I argue that such a theory of intrinsic value flies in the face of the subject/object and fact/value dichotomies of the metaphysical foundations of modem science—a problem Rolston never directly confronts. The modern scientific world view is obsolete. A post-modem scientific world view provides for a range of potential values in nature actualizable upon interaction with consciousness. The bestthat a modem scientific world view can provide are subject-generated—though not necessarily subject-centered—values in nature
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why There is No Evidence for the Intrinsic Value of Non-Humans.Toby Svoboda - 2011 - Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):25-36.
Anthropocentrism Vs. Nonanthropocentrism: Why Should We Care?Katie Mcshane - 2007 - Environmental Values 16 (May):169-186.
Similar books and articles
Against Rolston's Defense of Eating Animals.John Mizzoni - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):125-131.
Can Nature Be Evil?: Rolston, Disvalue, and Theodicy.Wayne Ouderkirk - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150.
Intrinsic Value, Quantum Theory, and Environmental Ethics.J. Baird Callicott - 1985 - Environmental Ethics 7 (3):257-275.
The Source and Locus of Intrinsic Value: A Reexamination.Keekok Lee - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):297-309.
Rolston, Lonergan, and the Intrinsic Value of Nature.Theodore W. Nunez - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):105 - 128.
Epistemology and Intrinsic Values: Norton and Callicott's Critiques of Rolston.Christopher J. Preston - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (4):409-428.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #204,012 of 2,171,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?