Bifocalism is in the eye of the beholder: Social learning as a developmental response to the accuracy of others' mentalizing

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e254 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary argues the case for developmental psychopathology in understanding social learning. Informed by work on “epistemic disruption,” we have described difficulties with social learning associated with many forms of psychopathology. Epistemic disruption manifests in an inability to move between innovation and conformity, and arises from poor mentalizing, which generates difficulties in identifying social cues that trigger the correct stance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Markov Learning Models for Multiperson Interactions. [REVIEW]D. B. N. - 1961 - Review of Metaphysics 15 (1):196-196.
Social Understanding without Mentalizing.Julian Kiverstein - 2011 - Philosophical Topics 39 (1):41-65.
How I Know What You Know.Shannon Spaulding - 2024 - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Learning and Value Change.J. Dmitri Gallow - 2019 - Philosophers' Imprint 19:1--22.
Mentalizing and Religion.Hanneke Schaap-Jonker & Jozef M. T. Corveleyn - 2014 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 36 (3):303-322.
Aesthetic Response to the Unfinished: Empathy, Imagination and Imitation Learning.Fabio Tononi - 2020 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 13 (1):135-153.
Classification of Age and Gender Using ResNet - Deep Learning.Aysha I. Mansour & Samy S. Abu-Naser - 2022 - International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER) 6 (8):20-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-09

Downloads
12 (#1,085,484)

6 months
8 (#361,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?