Did de Vries discover the law of segregation independently?

Annals of Science 37 (6):639-655 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that de Vries did not see Mendel's paper until 1900, and that, while his own theory of inheritance may have incorporated the notion of independent units, this pre-Mendelian formulation was not the same as Mendel's since it did not apply to paired hereditary units. Moreover, the way in which the term ‘segregation’ has been applied in the secondary literature has blurred the distinction between what is explained and the law which facilitates explanation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Closing the door on Hugo de Vries' Mendelism.Bert Theunissen - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (3):225-248.
Hugo de vries no mendelian?Onno G. Meijer - 1985 - Annals of Science 42 (3):189-232.
William Bateson's Introduction of Mendelism to England: A Reassessment.Robert Olby - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (4):399-420.
Heredity and its entities around 1900.Author unknown - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
27 (#577,411)

6 months
10 (#382,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reasoning in scientific change: Charles Darwin, Hugo de Vries, and the discovery of segregation.Lindley Darden - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (2):127-169.

Add more references