Why should the logic of discovery be revived?

In E. Ippoliti (ed.), Heuristic Reasoning. Springer. pp. 11-27 (2014)
Abstract
Three decades ago Laudan posed the challenge: Why should the logic of discovery be revived? This paper tries to answer this question arguing that the logic of discovery should be revived, on the one hand, because, by Gödel’s second incompleteness theorem, mathematical logic fails to be the logic of justification, and only reviving the logic of discovery logic may continue to have an important role. On the other hand, scientists use heuristic tools in their work, and it may be useful to study such tools systematically in order to improve current heuristic tools or to develop new ones. As a step towards reviving the logic of discovery, the paper follows Aristotle in asserting that logic must be a tool for the method of science, and outlines an approach to the logic of discovery based on the analytic method and on ampliative inference rules.
Keywords logic  discovery  analytic method
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Is It Justifiable to Abandon All Search for a Logic of Discovery?Mehul Shah - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):253 – 269.
Discovery and its Logic: Popper and the "Friends of Discovery".Claude Savary - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):318-344.
The Logics of Discovery in Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.
System-Problems in Kant.Zelko Loparic - 1988 - Synthese 74 (1):107 - 140.
Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic?Herbert A. Simon - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (4):471-480.
The Logic of Discovery.Kevin T. Kelly - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):435-452.
Faith, Reason, and the Logic of Discovery.Avery Dulles - 1970 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):485-502.
Added to PP index
2014-09-21

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
My notes
Sign in to use this feature