Simple rationality? The law of healthcare resource allocation in England

Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (7):404-407 (2007)

This paper examines the law relating to healthcare resource allocation in England. The National Health Service Act 1977 does not impose an absolute duty to provide specified healthcare services. The courts will only interfere with a resource allocation decision made by an NHS body if that decision is frankly irrational is engaged). Such irrationality is very difficult to establish. The ECHR has made no significant contribution to domestic English law in the arena of healthcare provision. The decision of the European Court in the Yvonne Watts case establishes that, in relation to the question of entitlement to seek treatment abroad at the expense of the NHS, a clinical judgment about the urgency of treatment trumps an administrative decision about waiting list targets. That decision goes against the grain of domestic law about healthcare allocation, but is not likely to have wide ramifications in domestic law.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2006.017905
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,566
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Integrated Approach to Resource Allocation.Louise M. Terry - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (2):171-180.
Healthcare Resource Allocation and the 'Recovery of Virtue'.N. Messer - 2005 - Studies in Christian Ethics 18 (1):89-108.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #282,071 of 2,325,505 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #523,443 of 2,325,505 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature