Consequentialism without Consequences: Ethics and Embryo Research

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):61 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The legitimacy of embryo research, use, and destruction is among the most important issues facing contemporary bioethics. In the preceding paper, Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu took up an argument of John Harris and tried to find some new ways of avoiding its dramatic consequences. They noted that: “John Harris has argued that if … it is morally permissible to engage in reproduction … despite knowledge that a large number of embryos will fail to implant and quickly die, then … it is morally permissible to produce embryos for other purposes that involve killing them, for instance, to harvest stem cells” and suggest that this argument fails

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embryo Research: Are There Any Lessons from Natural Reproduction?Julian Savulescu - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):68-75.
Embryo Loss in Natural Procreation and Stem Cell Research.James J. Delaney - 2012 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (3):461-476.
The Morality of Killing Human Embryos.Bonnie Steinbock - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (1):26-34.
A Not‐So‐New Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (1):32-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
63 (#249,817)

6 months
2 (#1,445,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Life's Dominion.Melissa Lane & Ronald Dworkin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):413.
Stem Cells, Sex, and Procreation.John Harris - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):353-371.

Add more references