Authors
Mazviita Chirimuuta
University of Pittsburgh
Abstract
This article examines the mutual influence between Ernst Cassirer and his cousin, the neurologist Kurt Goldstein. For both Cassirer and Goldstein, views on the nature of human cognition were fundamental to their understanding of scientific knowledge, and these were informed by both philosophical theorizing and empirical research on pathologies of the nervous system. Following Cassirer, and in agreement with the physicalism of the Vienna Circle, Goldstein held that the physical sciences had progressed by arriving at abstract, mathematical representations to take the place of qualitative characterizations of observable reality. In tension with physicalism, Goldstein was not sanguine about the fruitfulness of the abstractive approach in biology. He proposed that biology must adhere to its own sui generis methods of observation and experimentation in order to obtain knowledge of the “natures” of living organisms. I argue that there is a parallel with Cassirer’s assertion of the differences between physical and cultural sciences, underwritten by the deployment of varying symbolic functions. I also propose that the neurological writings of Goldstein are an important backdrop to Cassirer’s positive evaluation of abstract thought, in contrast to the pessimism regarding a worldview dominated by scientific abstractions expressed by philosophers such as Bergson, Whitehead, and Husserl.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/710181
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,920
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ernst Cassirer’s Philosophy of Biology.John Michael Krois - 2004 - Sign Systems Studies 32 (1/2):277-294.
Two Letters to Kurt Goldstein.Ernst Cassirer - 1999 - Science in Context 12 (4):661-667.
The Autonomy of Functional Biology: A Reply to Rosenberg.Marc Lange - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):93-109.
Lettere a Kurt Goldstein.Ernst Cassirer - 2012 - Archivio di Storia Della Cultura 25.
Cassirer y Gadamer: El arte como símbolo.Patricia Montero Pachano - 2005 - Revista de Filosofía 23 (51):58-69.
La idea de autonomía en biología.Arantza Etxeberria & Álvaro Moreno - 2007 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 40:21-37.
Cassirer y Gadamer: El arte como símbolo.Patricia Montero Pachano - 2005 - Revista de Filosofía (Venezuela) 51 (3):58-69.
Abstraktion Und Ideation — Zur Semantik Chemischer Und Biologischer Grundbegriffe.Mathias Gutmann & Gerd Hanekamp - 1996 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (1):29 - 53.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-18

Total views
13 ( #732,868 of 2,439,299 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,949 of 2,439,299 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes