Inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic

Synthese 192 (6):1643-1687 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Information exchange can be seen as a dynamic process of raising and resolving issues. The goal of this paper is to provide a logical framework to model and reason about this process. We develop an inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic , which enriches the standard framework of dynamic epistemic logic , incorporating insights from recent work on inquisitive semantics. At a static level, IDEL does not only allow us to model the information available to a set of agents, like standard epistemic logic, but also the issues that the agents entertain. At a dynamic level, IDEL does not only allow us to model the effects of communicative actions that provide new information, like standard DEL, but also the effects of actions that raise new issues. Thus, IDEL provides the fundamental tools needed to analyze information exchange as a dynamic process of raising and resolving issues

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Action models in inquisitive logic.Thom van Gessel - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3905-3945.
The dynamic logic of stating and asking.Ivano Ciardelli - 2017 - In Alexandru Baltag, Jeremy Seligman & Tomoyuki Yamada (eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2017. Springer. pp. 240-255.
Reducing Contrastive Knowledge.Michael Cohen - 2019 - Erkenntnis 86 (6):1547-1565.
Inquisitive bisimulation.Ivano Ciardelli & Martin Otto - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (1):77-109.
Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic.Barteld P. Kooi - 2003 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):381-408.
Dynamic Epistemic Logic for Implicit and Explicit Beliefs.Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (2):107-140.
An Epistemic Separation Logic with Action Models.Hans van Ditmarsch, Didier Galmiche & Marta Gawek - 2022 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 32 (1):89-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-06

Downloads
153 (#27,393)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Questions in Action.Daniel Hoek - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy 119 (3):113-143.
Semantic expressivism for epistemic modals.Peter Hawke & Shane Steinert-Threlkeld - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 44 (2):475-511.
Minimal Rationality and the Web of Questions.Daniel Hoek - forthcoming - In Dirk Kindermann, Peter van Elswyk, Andy Egan & Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini (eds.), Unstructured Content. Oxford University Press.
Contingency and Knowing Whether.Jie Fan, Yanjing Wang & Hans van Ditmarsch - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):75-107.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Inquisitive Semantics.Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk & Floris Roelofsen - 2018 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. A. G. Groenendijk & Floris Roelofsen.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Searle - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1):59-61.
Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction.Johan van Benthem - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references