Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11):716-717 (2019)

Authors
Nicholas Colgrove
Wake Forest University
Abstract
Jake Greenblum and Ryan K Hubbard argue that physicians, nurses, clinical ethicists and ethics committee members should not cite religious considerations when helping patients (or their proxies) make medical decisions. They provide two arguments for this position: The Public Reason Argument and the Fiduciary Argument. In this essay, I show that the Public Reason Argument fails. Greenblum and Hubbard may provide good reason to think that physicians should not invoke their own religious commitments as reasons for a particular medical decision. But they fail to show that it is wrong for physicians to cite the patient’s own religious commitments as reasons for a particular decision. As such, if Greenblum and Hubbard’s thesis is to survive, the Fiduciary Argument (or some unmentioned argument) will have to do the bulk of the work.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105678
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Studies in the Way of Words.D. E. Over - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (160):393-395.
Public Reason Can Be Reasonably Rejected.Franz Mang - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):343-367.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Images of Religions and Religious History in the Works of L. Ron Hubbard.Marco Frenschkowski - 2016 - Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review 7 (1):111-153.
Responding to Religious Reasons in Medicine.Lisa Zarin Soleymani Lehmann - 2003 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Investigating Integrity in Public Reason Liberalism.Alyssa Lowery - 2019 - Southwest Philosophy Review 35 (1):173-180.
Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values.James P. Sterba - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.
Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389.
Are Naturalism and Moral Realism Incompatible?Rik Peels - 2014 - Religious Studies 50 (1):77-86.
Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values.James P. Sterba - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:117-128.
Global Public Reason, Diversity, and Consent.Samuel Director - 2019 - Philosophical Papers 48 (1):31-57.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-01

Total views
164 ( #65,497 of 2,454,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #16,875 of 2,454,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes