The (In)Compatibility of the Privation Theory of Evil and the Mere-Difference View of Disability

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (2):329-348 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The privation theory of evil (PTE) states that evil is the absence of some good that is supposed to be present. For example, if vision is an intrinsic good, and if human beings are supposed to have vision, then PTE implies that a human being’s lacking vision is an evil, or a bad state of affairs. The mere-difference view of disability (MDD) states that disabilities like blindness are not inherently bad. Therefore, it would seem that lacking sight is not a bad state of affairs. Thus PTE and MDD seem to be in tension. This essay discusses that apparent tension and explains how it might be resolved without doing violence to either view. Given the prominence of PTE in the history of Christian theology, and the wide support for MDD among disability theorists, it is worth finding a way to harmonize these two views.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is it Bad to Be Disabled?Vuko Andric & Joachim Wundisch - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (3):1-17.
A Thomistic, Non-Ableist Conception of Impairment and Disability.Bryan R. Cross - 2020 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (2):233-242.
What is the Bad-Difference View of Disability?Thomas Crawley - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21 (3).
Chronic Pain, Mere-Differences, and Disability Variantism.Thomas Nadelhoffer - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Disability 2:6-27.
Is disability mere difference?Greg Bognar - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (1):46-49.
Chronic Pain, Mere-Differences, and Disability Variantism.Thomas Nadelhoffer - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Disability 2:6-27.
Why Intellectual Disability is Not Mere Difference.James B. Gould - 2022 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (3):495-509.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-03

Downloads
633 (#28,828)

6 months
158 (#23,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Colgrove
Augusta University

Citations of this work

Disability, Enhancement, and Flourishing.Jason T. Eberl - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (5):597-611.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Harming as causing harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In M. A. Roberts & D. T. Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons. Springer Verlag. pp. 137--154.
A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.Jason T. Eberl - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):289-310.
Evil is privation.Bill Anglin & Stewart Goetz - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1):3 - 12.
Disability and the Theodicy of Defeat.Aaron D. Cobb & Kevin Timpe - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:100-120.
Right to life of handicapped.A. Davis - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (3):181-181.

Add more references