What should be done improve reviewing?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):143-143 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00065766

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected.Michael J. A. Howe - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):218-219.
The Ethics of Social Intervention.Harold Orlans, Edward Diener, Rick Crandall, Gordon Bermant, Herbert C. Kelman & Donald P. Warwick - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (3):42.
Responsibility in reviewing and research.Sol Tax & Robert A. Rubinstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-240.
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.
Ethics in Social Science: A Long Way to Go.Harold Orlans - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (3):42-43.
Authorship and manuscript reviewing: The risk of bias.Lois DeBakey - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):208-209.
What then should we do?Seth Roberts - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):532-533.
A case for less selfing and more outbreeding in reviewing the literature.Michael E. Lamb & Eric L. Charnov - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):109-109.
What should a theory of schizophrenia be able to do?Kurt Salzinger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):44-45.
So what should information look like?Donald A. Norman - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (3):361-362.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)

6 months
25 (#118,899)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Journal response time: A case for multiple submission.Albert Somit & Steven A. Peterson - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):533-534.
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement. [REVIEW]Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):534-536.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.

View all 46 references / Add more references