Bioethics 24 (9):445-452 (2010)

Authors
Eva Dadlez
University of Central Oklahoma
Abstract
The contention that abortion harms women constitutes a new strategy employed by the pro-life movement to supplement arguments about fetal rights. David C. Reardon is a prominent promoter of this strategy. Post-abortion syndrome purports to establish that abortion psychologically harms women and, indeed, can harm persons associated with women who have abortions. Thus, harms that abortion is alleged to produce are multiplied. Claims of repression are employed to complicate efforts to disprove the existence of psychological harm and causal antecedents of trauma are only selectively investigated. We argue that there is no such thing as post-abortion syndrome and that the psychological harms Reardon and others claim abortion inflicts on women can usually be ascribed to different causes. We question the evidence accumulated by Reardon and his analysis of data accumulated by others. Most importantly, we question whether the conclusions Reardon has drawn follow from the evidence he cites
Keywords pro‐life  abortion  post‐abortion syndrome  harm principle
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01739.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Sensible Confucian Perspective on Abortion.Amy Olberding - 2015 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (2):235-253.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-09

Total views
58 ( #164,430 of 2,349,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes