Belief merging with the aim of truthlikeness

Synthese 193 (7):2013-2034 (2016)

Authors
Simon D'Alfonso
University of Melbourne (PhD)
Abstract
The merging/fusion of belief/data collections in propositional logic form is a topic that has received due attention within the domains of database and AI research. A distinction can be made between two types of scenarios to which the process of merging can be applied. In the first type, the collections represent preferences, such as the voting choices of a group of people, that need to be aggregated so as to give a consistent result that in some way best represents the collective judgement of the group. In the second type, the collections represent factual data that is to be aggregated with an aim of obtaining a result that maximises factual correctness. After introducing a general framework for belief merging via some prominent literature on the topic, this paper then introduces and considers a method for belief merging with the second type of scenario in mind. Its suitability is corroborated by demonstrating how it can be seen as a special case of a merging procedure that combines aggregation of probabilities and maximisation of expected truthlikeness
Keywords Belief merging  Information fusion  Truthlikeness  Judgment aggregation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-015-0825-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,413
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Truthlikeness.Graham Oddie - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia.
Truthlikeness.David Pearce - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):297-300.
Verisimilitude: The Third Period.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):1-29.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Scientific Metaphysical Naturalisation of Information.Bruce Long - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Sydney

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logic Based Merging.Sébastien Konieczny & Ramón Pino Pérez - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):239-270.
Belief Revision.Hans Rott - 1995 - In Jonathan Eric Adler & Lance J. Rips (eds.), Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and its Foundations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 514--534.
Revising Beliefs Towards the Truth.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (2):165-181.
Merging of Legal Micro-Ontologies From European Directives.Sylvie Despres & Sylvie Szulman - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2):187-200.
Information Structures in Belief Revision.Hans Rott - 2008 - In Johan Van Benthem & Pieter Adriaans (eds.), Philosophy of Information, Vol. 8 of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 457–482.
Belief Base Merging as a Game.Sébastien Konieczny - 2004 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14 (3):275-294.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-19

Total views
58 ( #154,034 of 2,291,837 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #231,371 of 2,291,837 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature