On whether the buddhist 'syllogism' (par rth num na) is a Sui generis inference

Asian Philosophy 1 (2):175 – 183 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

­A defense of analogy inference as sui generis.André Lars Joen Juthe - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
Is vagueness Sui generis ?David Barnett - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5 – 34.
Buddhism: A Modern Perspective.Charles S. Prebish (ed.) - 1975 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Ramsey Sentences and Avoiding the Sui Generis.Frank Jackson - 2005 - In Hallvard Lillehammer & David Hugh Mellor (eds.), Ramsey's Legacy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Is Communication Emerging or Sui Generis?L. Leydesdorff - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):111-112.
Thoughts and the Sui Generis.A. R. Lacey - 1963 - Mind 72 (285):129 - 132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#330,353)

6 months
6 (#701,155)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A dictionary of philosophy.Antony Flew (ed.) - 1979 - New York: Gramercy Books.
Buddhist Logic.E. B. & Th Stcherbatsky - 1964 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 84 (4):490.
Buddhist formal logic.R. S. Y. Chi - 1969 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
A sixth-century manual of indian logic.Musashi Tachikawa - 1970 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 1 (2):111-145.
Buddhist Logic and Epistemology.Bimal Krishna Matilal & Robert D. Evans - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (2):252-255.

View all 15 references / Add more references