Philosophical Studies 137 (3):335-367 (2008)

Authors
Neil Delaney
Brown University
Abstract
Philosophers from Hart to Lewis, Johnston and Bennett have expressed various degrees of reservation concerning the doctrine of double effect. A common concern is that, with regard to many activities that double effect is traditionally thought to prohibit, what might at first look to be a directly intended bad effect is really, on closer examination, a directly intended neutral effect that is closely connected to a foreseen bad effect. This essay examines the extent to which the commonsense concept of intention supports a reasonably consistent and coherent application of double effect. Two important conclusions are these: (1) a number of traditionally proscribed activities involve a kind of “targeting” of innocents that can be taken to exhibit a direct intention to harm them; (2) a direct intention to harm need not involve a desire to harm in any ordinary sense of the latter expression.
Keywords Intention  Targeting  Desire  Double Effect  Bennett  Sellars
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-0004-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Intention.G. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
Philosophical Papers.J. L. Austin - 1961 - Oxford University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Just War Theory: Revisionists Vs Traditionalists.Seth Lazar - 2017 - Annual Review of Political Science 20:37-54.
Lethal Organ Donation: Would the Doctor Intend the Donor’s Death?Ben Bronner - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (4):442-458.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Doctrine of Double Effect.Neil Delaney - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):397-406.
The Danger of Double Effect.P. A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
Defending Double Effect.Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - Ratio 24 (4):384-401.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Some Light on Double Effect.James G. Hanink - 1975 - Analysis 35 (5):147 - 151.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
301 ( #29,312 of 2,439,026 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #50,838 of 2,439,026 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes