Authors
Tyler McNabb
University of Saint Joseph, Macau
Mike DeVito
University of Birmingham
Abstract
A family of objections to theism aims to show that certain key theological doctrines, when held in conjunction, are incompatible. The longstanding problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom represents one such objection. In this essay, we provide the theist an epistemic approach to the problem that allows for the rational affirmation of both divine foreknowledge and human freedom despite their prima facie incompatibility. Specifically, we apply James Anderson’s Rational Affirmation of Paradox Theology model to the problem, arguing that the theist can stave off defeat that arises from a belief in the conjunction of both doctrines by appealing to paradox. In order to establish this thesis, we first define key terms as well as lay out the theological fatalist argument. Next, we explicate Anderson’s model and apply it to the foreknowledge and freedom problem. We conclude by addressing the objection that an appeal to paradox is simply special pleading for the theist, arguing that the naturalist can be found in a similar epistemic position.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-021-09791-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Why Free Will is Real.Christian List - 2019 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge.Linda Trinkaus-Zagzebski - 1993 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 34 (2):118-120.
Foreknowledge and Human Freedom in Augustine.Vance G. Morgan - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:223-242.
Foreknowledge and Human Freedom in Augustine.Vance G. Morgan - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:223-242.
Divine Foreknowledge and Necessity.In-kyu Song - 1996 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Foreknowledge, Freedom, and Obligation.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):321-339.
Why Divine Foreknowledge?Michael Robinson - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (3):251-275.
The Truth About Foreknowledge.Patrick Todd & John Martin Fischer - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (3):286-301.
Belief, Foreknowledge, and Theological Fatalism.Charles T. Hughes - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):378-387.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-02-08

Total views
49 ( #222,389 of 2,462,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #38,165 of 2,462,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes