Medical Interventions During Pregnancy in Light of Dobbs

Ethics and Medics 47 (8):1-4 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s decision in the Dobb’s case has given rise to confusion in the medical community, mostly concerning the specific definition of an abortion and what procedures are acceptable. Catholic bioethics has a long history of examining the ethical issues surrounding procedures used in vital conflict situations and other instances where direct or indirect abortion may be the preferred treatment. This article lays out the important points and ethical dimensions surrounding some of the most common pregnancy related interventions and provides guidance to physicians seeking to treat both patients in a manner that acknowledges their value as human beings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teaching Bioethics Today: Waking from Dogmatic Curricular Slumbers.Leonard M. Fleck - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-8.
Against Salpingostomy as a Treatment for Ectopic Pregnancy.Samuel E. Hager - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (1):39-48.
Direct and Indirect Abortion.Patrick Lee - 1998 - Ethics and Medics 23 (2):1-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-24

Downloads
13 (#288,494)

6 months
12 (#1,086,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references