Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):884-885 (2001)
The theory of event coding by Hommel et al. proposes that feature binding is a central component of action planning. To evaluate the binding hypothesis, we consider findings from studies of action-perception interference and bimanual movements. We argue that although binding of action features may be a valuable concept, interference from partial feature overlap does not provide a parsimonious account for the observed phenomena.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Handbook of Binding and Memory: Perspectives From Cognitive Neuroscience.Hubert Zimmer, Axel Mecklinger & Ulman Lindenberger (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Neural Circuits, Matrices, and Conjunctive Binding.Robert F. Hadley - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):80-80.
(Dis)Solving the Binding Problem.James W. Garson - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):381 – 392.
There's Binding and There's Binding, or is There Just Binding? : Neuropsychological Insights From Bálint's Syndrome.Glyn Humphreys - 2012 - In Jeremy M. Wolfe & Lynn C. Robertson (eds.), From Perception to Consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman. Oxford University Press. pp. 324.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #400,480 of 2,163,675 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,675 )
How can I increase my downloads?