Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (1):125-142 (2018)
Abstract |
Retributivism may seem wholly uninterested in the fit between penal policy and public opinion, but on one rendition of the theory, here called ‘popular retributivism,’ deserved punishments are constituted by the penal conventions of the community. This paper makes two claims against this view. First, the intuitive appeal of popular retributivism is undermined once we distinguish between context sensitivity and convention sensitivity about desert. Retributivism in general can freely accept context sensitivity without being committed to the stronger notion of convention sensitivity. Second, it is not obviously a merit of popular retributivism that it admits a gradual lowering of punishments by softening public opinion. Retributivists have reason to be skeptical of softening public opinion if it comes at the price of undermining the extent to which offenders are thought to deserve censure. In sum, in this paper, I argue that there are ways of making retributivism sensitive to public opinion without arriving at the conclusion that popular penal conventions should govern retributive justice itself.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11572-017-9415-z |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law.Victor Tadros - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature.Steven Pinker - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (4):765-767.
View all 30 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Injustice and the Right to Punish.Göran Duus-Otterström & Erin I. Kelly - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (2):e12565.
Do Offenders Deserve Proportionate Punishments?Göran Duus-Otterström - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (3):463-480.
Similar books and articles
Desert of What? On Murphy’s Reluctant Retributivism.Linda Radzik - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):161-173.
Making More Sense of Retributivism: Desert as Responsibility and Proportionality.J. Angelo Corlett - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (2):279-287.
Mark D. White : Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy: Oxford University Press, New York, 2011, 272 Pp. [REVIEW]Jules Holroyd - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):177-188.
Dialectical Retributivism: Why Apologetic Offenders Deserve Reductions in Punishment Even Under Retributive Theories.Nick Smith - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (2):343-360.
Fairness-Based Retributivism Reconsidered.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):481-498.
Reciprocity as a Justification for Retributivism.Jami L. Anderson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (1):13-25.
Moral Responsibility, Guilt, and Retributivism.Randolph Clarke - 2016 - The Journal of Ethics 20 (1-3):121-137.
Distributive and Retributive Desert in Rawls.Jake Greenblum - 2010 - Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (2):169-184.
Retributivism, Consequentialism, and the Intrinsic Goodness of Punishment.David Dolinko - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):507-528.
Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment.George Schedler - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
Jeffrie G. Murphy.Some Second Thoughts On Retributivism - 2011 - In Mark White (ed.), Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy. Oxford University Press.
Sophisticated Retributivism.Hegel On Punishment & A. More - 2011 - In Mark White (ed.), Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy. Oxford University Press.
Sarah Holtman.Retributivism Kant & Civic Respect - 2011 - In Mark White (ed.), Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy. Oxford University Press. pp. 107.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-03-31
Total views
23 ( #492,550 of 2,505,228 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,997 of 2,505,228 )
2017-03-31
Total views
23 ( #492,550 of 2,505,228 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,997 of 2,505,228 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads