Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):409-433 (2008)
Two types of truth table tasks are used investigating mental representations of conditionals: a possibilities-based and a truth-based one. In possibilities tasks, participants indicate whether a situation is possible or impossible according to the conditional rule. In truth tasks participants evaluate whether a situation makes the rule true or false, or is irrelevant with respect to the truth of the rule. Comparing the two-option version of the possibilities task with the truth task in Experiment 1, the possibilities task yields logical answer patterns whereas the truth task yields defective patterns. Adding the irrelevant option to the possibilities task in Experiment 2 leads to a considerable amount of defective patterns in the possibilities task, but still to more logical patterns in the possibilities task than in the truth task. Experiment 3 shows that directionality matters since rule-to-situation tasks yield more logical answer patterns than do situation-to-rule tasks. We conclude that both task types are not comparable as such since wording, number of options and directionality influence the results
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
From Falsification to Generating an Alternative Hypothesis: Exploring the Role of the New-Perspective Hypothesis in Successful 2-4-6 Task Performance. [REVIEW]Yunn-Wen Lien & Wei-Lun Lin - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (2):105 - 136.
Is the Truth Table Task Mistaken?Aline Sevenants, Kristien Dieussaert & Walter Schaeken - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (2):119 - 132.
On Imagining What is True (and What is False).Patricia Barres & P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (1):1 – 42.
Positive Transfer and Negative Transfer/Anti-Learning of Problem Solving Skills.Magda Osman - unknown
Defective Truth Tables and Falsifying Cards: Two Measurement Models Yield No Evidence of an Underlying Fleshing-Out Propensity.Vautier Stéphane & Bonnefon Jean-François - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):231-243.
Defective Truth Tables and Falsifying Cards: Two Measurement Models Yield No Evidence of an Underlying Fleshing-Out Propensity. Jean-Fran - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):231 – 243.
Truth Table Tasks: Irrelevance and Cognitive Ability.Aline Sevenants, Kristien Dieussaert & Walter Schaeken - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (3):213 - 246.
Added to index2010-08-20
Total downloads21 ( #234,528 of 2,158,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #133,489 of 2,158,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?