Is Plato's a Caste State, Based on Racial Differences?

Classical Quarterly 44 (1-2):38- (1950)
This is partly a verbal question, depending on the meaning of the word ‘caste’. I propose to assume that if we say that a State is a caste State we imply at least two things: that its members are divided into mutually exclusive endogamous classes, and that no one may be transferred from one class to another—unless possibly to a lower class. The State which Plato describes in the Republic satisfies the first of these conditions. Dr. Popper, who believes that it is a caste State, maintains that it also satisfies the second. In addition he contends that the original basis of the class division is racial. My object in the notes which follow is to argue that both these contentions are false
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S000983880002797X
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Three Ways of Resisting Racism.Bence Nanay - 2010 - The Monist 93 (2):255-280.
Humiliation: Claims and Context.Gopal Guru (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press India.
In Defence of State-Based Reasons to Intend.James Morauta - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):208-228.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

11 ( #400,818 of 2,164,581 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #84,058 of 2,164,581 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums