This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

475 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 475
Material to categorize
  1. Legislation as Legal Interpretation: The Role of Legal Expertise and Political Representation.Attila Mráz - 2022 - In Francesco Ferraro & Silvia Zorzetto (eds.), Exploring the Province of Legislation: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Legisprudence. Dordrecht: pp. 33-56.
    While some descriptive and normative theories of legislation account for an extensive role of legal interpretation in legislation, others see its legislative role as marginal. Yet in contemporary constitutional democracies, where legislation is limited and guided by constitutional norms, as well as international and supranational law, legal interpretation must play some role in legislation—even if all or most of legislative activity may not be adequately described and evaluated as legal interpretation. In this chapter, I aim to explore some implications of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. On Universal Relevance in Legal Reasoning.BarbaraBaum Levenbook - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):1 - 23.
    The purpose of this essay is to defend a claim that a certain consideration, which I call unworkability, is universally and necessarily relevant to legal reasoning. By that I mean that it is a consideration that must carry legal weight in the justification of some judicial decisions in every legal system in which (1) all disputed matters of law can be adjudicated, and (2) all judicial decisions are to be legally justified. Unworkability's necessary relevance has important implications for a theory (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
    This article deals with the relation between a theory of law and a theory of legal reasoning. Starting from a close reading of Chapter VII of H. L. A. Hart's "The Concept of Law", it claims that a theory of law like Hart's requires a particular theory of legal reasoning, or at least a theory of legal reasoning with some particular characteristics. It then goes on to say that any theory of legal reasoning that satisfies those requirements is highly implausible, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. Emotional Legal Arguments and a Broken Leg.Damasceno-Morais Rubens - unknown
    We intend to examine ways that emotions may be intertwined within argumentative legal discourses. From the transcript of a brief trial in a Court of Appeal in Brazil we have the opportunity to observe how the emotional and rational reasoning live together in a deliberation among magistrates. “The leg broken case” allow us to examine how judges define the value of compensation to be paid in cases of moral damage. We show that not only technical arguments are the compounds of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Law and Exclusionary Reasons.Larry Alexander - 1990 - Philosophical Topics 18 (1):5-22.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6. Moral and Legal Reasoning.L. Jonathan Cohen & Samuel Stoljar - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (1):141.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7. Persuasive Authority in the Law.Grant Lamond - 2010 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 17 (1):16-35.
    This article discusses the nature of persuasive authorities in the common law, and argues that many of them are best understood in terms of their (being regarded) as having theoretical rather than practical authorities for the courts that cite them. The contrast between theoretical and practical authority is examined at length in order to support the view that the treatment of many persuasive authorities by courts is more consistent with this view. Finally, it is argued that if persuasive authorities are (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.Neil MacCormick - 1994 - Clarendon Press.
    What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? This book examines this and other questions central to the study of jurisprudence. Care has been taken to make the legal elements of the book readily accessible to non-lawyers, and the philosophical elements to non-philosophers.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  9. The Judicial Community.Christopher Kutz - 2001 - Philosophical Issues 11 (1):442-469.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  10. Demystifying Legal Reasoning.Larry Alexander & Emily Sherwin (eds.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
    Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  11. Constraint and Freedom in the Common Law.John Horty - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15:1-27.
    This paper contributes to our formal understanding of the common law — especially the nature of the reasoning involved, but also its point, or justification, in terms of social coordination. I present two apparently distinct models of constraint by precedent in the common law, establish their equivalence, and argue for a perspective according to which courts are best thought of, not as creating and modifying rules, but as generating a social priority ordering on reasons through a procedure that is piecemeal, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  12. Reconstructing the Weight of Legal Arguments.H. José Plug - unknown
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic.Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez & Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
    This volume explores the relation between legal reasoning and logic from both a historical and a systematic perspective. The topics addressed include, among others, conditional legal acts, disjunctions in legal acts, presumptions and conjectures, conflicts of values, Jørgensen´s Dilemma, the Rhetor´s Dilemma, the theory of legal fictions and the categorization of contracts. The unifying problematic of these contributions concerns the conditional structures and, more particularly, the relationship between legal theory and legal reasoning in the context of conditions.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14. Legal Reasoning as Fact Finding? A Contribution to the Analysis of Criminal Adjudication.Federico Picinali - 2014 - Jurisprudence 5 (2):299-327.
    This paper attempts to shed light on the dynamics of criminal adjudication. It starts by exploring some significant—and often ignored—similarities and dissimilarities between the practices and disciplines of, respectively, legal reasoning and fact finding. It then discusses the problem of defining the nature of these processes—legal reasoning, in particular—in terms of their being instances of practical or theoretical reasoning. Thus understood, the problem is shown to be distinct from two traditional questions of jurisprudence, namely whether law consists of facts and, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. The Nature of the Common Law.Melvin Eisenberg (ed.) - 1988 - Harvard University Press.
    Common law rules predominate in some areas of law, such as torts and contracts, and are extremely important in other areas, such as corporations. Nevertheless, it has been unclear what principles courts use--or should use--in establishing common law rules. In this lucid book, Melvin Eisenberg develops the principles that govern this process.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  16. On Law and Legal Reasoning.Fernando Atria & Fernando Atria Lemaître - 2001 - Hart Publishing.
    This book seeks to examine the relations that obtain between law and a theory of law and legal reasoning and a theory of legal reasoning.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  17. Focusing the Law What Legal Interpretation is Not.Martin Stone - 1994 - Faculty of Law, University of Toronto.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  18. Introduction to Legal Reasoning.John Swan - 1979 - University of Toronto, Faculty of Law.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Principles, Rules, and Cases: The Logic of Judicial Decisions.Bruce Lee Miller - 1970 - Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Toward a Theory of Legal Justification.Richard Alan Wasserstrom - 1960 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
  21. Aspects modernes du raisonnement jurisprudentiel.J. Belin-Milleron - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):3.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Criteria of Adequacy for Judicial Reasoning.W. T. Blackstone - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):233.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Judicial Reasoning and Theoretical Reasoning.A. de Cervera - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):471.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Legal Reasoning in History.L. Tarnoi De Tharno - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):209.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. La logique juridique à la lumière du rapport entre lalogique et les autres sciences.P. Cosmovici - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):459.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. La justification en droit.G. Bellussi - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):229.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Principles and Politics in the Justification of Legal Decisions.J. F. Doyle - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):257.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. On Locating Values in Judicial Inference.A. Edel - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):31.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Martin Golding, Legal Reasoning. [REVIEW]Jerome Bickenbach - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6:62-64.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. "Discovery" in Legal Decision Making.Bruce Anderson - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (2):177-192.
  31. Current Views on Legal Reasoning: The Problem of Communication.Bruce Anderson - 1997 - Method 15 (2):151-168.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. The Semantics of Legal Reasoning.Claude Henry Prevots - 1961 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. JENSEN, O. C. -The Nature of Legal Argument. [REVIEW]A. M. Honoré - 1958 - Mind 67:561.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Changing Legal Systems: Legal Abrogations and Annulments in Defeasible Logic.Guido Governatori & Antonino Rotolo - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (1):157-194.
    In this paper we investigate how to represent and reason about legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic. We examine some options that embed in this setting, and in similar rule-based systems, ideas from belief and base revision. In both cases, our conclusion is negative, which suggests to adopt a different logical model. This model expresses temporal aspects of legal rules, and distinguishes between two main timelines, one internal to a given temporal version of the legal system, and another relative (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  35. Il Petrarchismo Giuridico: Filosofia E Logica Del Diritto Agli Inizi Dell'umanesimo.Maurizio Manzin - 1994
  36. A Theory of Legal Argumentation the Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification.Robert Alexy, Ruth Adler & Neil MacCormick (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
    Robert Alexy develops his influential theory of legal reasoning exploring the nature of legal argumentation and its relation to practical reasoning. In doing so he sheds light on fundamental questions of law and rationality, which are as crucial to practising lawyers and law students as they are to scholars of legal theory.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  37. Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law a Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory, and Legal Institutions.P. S. Atiyah & Robert S. Summers - 1987
  38. The Foundations of Legal Reasoning.Geoffrey Samuel - 1994 - Maklu Pub.
  39. Legal Reasoning.Martin P. Golding - 1983
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  40. An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning.Steven J. Burton - 1985 - Aspen Publishers.
    Steven Burton's AN INTRODUCTION TO LAW AND LEGAL REASONING, Second Edition continues to be an ideal learning tool for first-year law students in a variety of introductory courses including orientation programs, legal reasoning, lawyering skills, or first-year substantive courses. Written specifically for beginning law students, this concise paperback helps students gain an understanding of law and legal reasoning by emphasizing how they can use cases, rules, precedent, holding, and other elementary legal concepts to solve legal problems. Especially easy to use, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  41. The Nature of the Judicial Process.Benjamin N. Cardozo (ed.) - 1921 - Yale Univ. Pr.
    Featuring a new, explanatory Foreword by Justice Cardozo's premier biographer, this renowned and much-used analysis of the process of judicial decision-making includes embedded page numbers from the original 1921 edition for continuity of citations and syllabi.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  42. The Logic of Time in Law and Legal Expert Systems.Daniel Poulin Ejan Mackaay - 1990 - Ratio Juris 3 (2):254-271.
    . Research on an expert system regarding unemployment insurance law has pointed to the difficulties of explicitly representing temporal relations. The question has been addressed in the artificial intelligence literature with respect to planning systems and linguistic analysis. The approaches adopted do not appear to be directly transposable to legal discourse. The problem seems so far to have escaped notice amongst researchers attempting to develop legal expert systems. The paper explores in a preliminary way how lawyers use temporal concepts. It (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. [REVIEW]E. N. G. - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):167-168.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  44. Pluralismo Argomentativo. Sull’Argomentazione Dell’Interpretazione.Mauro Barberis - 2006 - Etica E Politica 8 (1):1-21.
    The name of the theory of legal argumentation this paper subscribes could be argumentative pluralism - an application of value pluralism to legal argumentation. Legal reasons and arguments, as well as ethical values, are plural and conflicting - their conflicts too cannot be resolved by any general lexical order. The first section of the paper provides a definition of legal argumentation and some theses on its structure and methodology; the second one analyses ten legal arguments; the third one provides three (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Some Introductory Remarks on Legal Interpretation and Legal Reasoning. A Philosophical Approach.Aldo Schiavello - 2006 - Etica E Politica 8 (1):1-11.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Gardner on Legal Reasoning.Fábio P. Shecaira - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (6):747-772.
    In Chapters 2, 3 and 7 of his new book, Law as a Leap of Faith, John Gardner provides the elements of an account of legal reasoning. It is on the basis of this account that Gardner defends or supports some of the most important theses of his book, viz. theses pertaining to how law can be made, to the relation between law and morality, and to the legitimacy of judicial law-making. A central element of Gardner’s account is a distinction (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Stefan Goltzberg: L’Argumentation Juridique: Dalloz, Paris, 2013, 118 Pp, ISBN: 978-2-247-12552-4.Audrey Soussan - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (3):523-529.
    «Existe-t-il une argumentation juridique?», c’est la question à laquelle tente de répondre l’ouvrage de Stefan Goltzberg, intitulé explicitement L’argumentation juridique. Si l’auteur commence son ouvrage en posant directement la question, on en cherche aussitôt, par un réflexe de «juriste», la définition. Et il faut probablement lire l’intégralité de ce petit ouvrage pour voir se profiler une définition de l’argumentation juridique. Or, au cours de cette lecture Stefan Goltzberg nous montre en quoi chercher la définition, la poser, est déjà une marque (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Erratum To: Stefan Goltzberg: L’Argumentation Juridique: Dalloz, Paris, 2013, 118 Pp, ISBN: 978-2-247-12552-4.Audrey Soussan - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (3):531-531.
    Erratum to: Int J Semiot Law DOI 10.1007/s11196-014-9376-7Dans la publication originale de cet article, l’auteur n’a pas cité le titre correct de la thèse de philosophie de Stefan Goltzberg.A la dernière phrase du premier paragraphe, il ne faut pas lire «il a écrit une thèse de philosophie intitulé Théorie et histoire de la philosophie du droit, philosophie du droit de Chaïm Perelman, de Theodor Viehweg, de Roscoe Pound» mais bien «il a écrit une thèse de philosophie intitulée Théorie bidimensionnelle de (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Rhetoric Meets Rational Argumentation Theory.Mirjami Paso - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (2):236-251.
    The theory of rhetoric is recognised and widely used in a number of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. It is therefore slightly surprising that it has not gained an important footing in jurisprudence. It is often argued that rhetoric and argumentative justification are clearly different issues. However, the present paper argues that they are in fact two aspects of argumentation and that the theory of rhetoric may be used also in the context of legal reasoning.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Case-Based Reasoning and the Deep Structure Approach to Knowledge Representation, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference On.Andrej Kowalski - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 475